Obama Judge Rules That Border Fences Are Racist

(moonbattery) - The concept of “disparate impact” allows liberals to denounce anything they oppose as “racist.” This includes even the existence of the USA as a sovereign nation with borders it has a right to defend from invasion. Political correctness has always been primarily about destroying America, but it is rarely employed to that end as obviously as this:

A Homeland Security initiative to put fencing along the U.S.-Mexico border could discriminate against minorities, according to an Obama-appointed federal judge [Beryl Howell] who’s ruled that the congressionally-approved project may have a “disparate impact on lower-income minority communities.”
This of course means that protecting the porous—and increasingly violent—southern border is politically incorrect. At least that’s what the public college professor at the center of the case is working to prove and this month she got help from a sympathetic federal judge. Denise Gilman, a clinical professor at the taxpayer-funded University of Texas-Austin, is researching the “human rights impact” of erecting a barrier to protect the U.S. from terrorists, illegal immigrants, drug traffickers and other serious threats.

The most serious threat is the ongoing invasion by Third World colonists lured by generous welfare payments, which is arguably the most profound existential threat America has ever faced. This is America only to the extent it is populated by Americans. Repopulate it with Third World peasants and America will have ceased to exist.

Full Story